Apple:
- iPhone - despite their closed approach, single carrier strategy and Google's aggressive Android push, the iPhone continues to gobble up smartphone market share. For the quarter ending March 28, Apple sold 8.75 million iPhones, representing 131% unit growth year over year. Users don't search as much on their iPhones as they do on their desktop or laptop PCs. iPhone customers, instead, depend on Apps to find and enjoy digital information and content. Apple's App ecosystem and superior user experience are key to the success of the iPhone.
- iPad - 500,000 units have shipped in the first week or so. This new device type, which runs on the mobile, iPhone OS, is changing the game in terms of how we consume and interact with digital media.
- iAd - introduced on April 8, this program greatly benefits developers, publishers and advertisers. All iAds will be hosted and served by Apple. More about this can be found here and here.
- iTravel - on April 21, Apple filed a patent for iTravel - their travel-centric App for the iPhone and iPad. Apple is getting into the travel transaction (full user experience) business according to the filing. This is consistent with their iAd strategy to allow advertisers to reach iPhone and iPad users without making them leave the App to respond to or buy from the iAd.
- Implication for Google: For the first time, Apple is now in the digital advertising business and they have the mobile OS and platform to grow their advertising market share at Google's expense.
- 400 million active users - also, it was announced on March 19 that Facebook eclipsed Google and became the largest website in terms of page views.
- Social Plug-ins - last week, Facebook announced their new distributed "Like" program which will significantly grow their rich user data and provide earned media value for commercial websites of all types. This valuable profile data will yield greater advertising value (ROI) and quickly grow Facebook into a digital advertising powerhouse.
- New Graph API and platform - this simpler platform is designed to add value for developers, users and commercial websites. This should result in more "social graph" data for advertisers to target.
- Implication for Google: Facebook is innovating quickly and solidifying itself as an extremely large and valuable advertising platform where precise targeting can occur - sounds similar to how we described Google 5 or 6 years ago.
- Yahoo Search Partnership - this deal will allow the #2 and #3 player to join forces to battle Google.
- Bing launch and share growth - for the first time in memory, a search engine besides Google gained search market share. Microsoft has shown a great ability to innovate with Bing.
- Facebook Partnership - last week, Facebook and Microsoft announced their social collaboration through the Docs.com launch. This site, which leverages Office, cloud computing and Facebook, enables users to create and share Microsoft office documents with their Facebook friends.
- Implication for Google: Microsoft has a war chest of cash and is spending it to gain market share in Search and cloud-based Apps - two strategic markets for Google.
- Android mobile OS and Nexus One phone - launched on multiple carriers with numerous headset models including Google's Nexus One phone. Early results suggest these phones are selling and allowing Google to gain smartphone market share, at the expense of RIM and Palm. Android phones make "searching" the web a lot easier than iPhones.
- Bazaarvoice partnership - Last week, an interesting partnership between Google and Bazaarvoice was announced. Bazaarvoice provides private label user review technology to many major manufacturers and online retailers. Google will index these reviews and aggregate user scores and include them in search results and sponsored search ads. This exciting integration of earned media with paid media and search results will be interesting to watch.
- ITA acquisition - just a rumor, but the strategic thinking behind this potential travel acquisition shows that Google is now willing to risk their AdWords revenue and compete with some of their largest advertisers (Expedia, Orbitz, etc.) in order to dis-intermediate the travel supply chain and bring more efficiency to the travel market.
Great summary, Jack. Google's Baazarvoice acquisition is particularly interesting, I think, b/c it further highlights their broad strategy of enveloping the entire web with a variety of their services vs FB's strategy of starting from a single domain and then branching out.
ReplyDeleteFrom a social media point of view, Google's primary strategy is simply to index the social media content of the other platforms along with the rest of the web. This includes FB, Twitter, and now Baazarvoice. At present, that seems to be getting better results vs their own efforts in social media and collaboration (see Buzz and Wave).
I'm keeping an eye on their Android platform and voice search technologies, especially. We talk a lot about iPad and touch interfaces, but Google is focusing on "talk" interfaces + indexing audio search requests and content. It is important to keep in mind that all voice commands through the android platform pass through google. Even basic "Call Mom" commands. That's a valuable source of data that will continue to grow along with Android sales.
Final note- when we think about the home systems of the future, voice will be as/more important than touch / motion. Google is experimenting here with GoogleTV and providing ISP services, so I'm sure this war will stretch out on even more fronts over the next few years...
Great comments, Aaron. I should have listed Google's launch of Buzz. How is Buzz doing?
ReplyDeleteAgree that voice is important. But voice, keyboard, and clicking on hyperlinks is not going to be sufficient. I believe that Google is squandering its position as innovation leader and has a very short window for recovery.
ReplyDeleteThe web and consumer entertainment are under enormous evolutionary pressure. I don't see Google responding in way that positions them to prosper and dominate in the new eco-system.
Good Mashable blog post about Apple mobile search using voice, etc. and what this could mean for Google. http://mashable.com/2010/04/28/siri-mobile-search/#
ReplyDeleteGreat piece! Very informative.
ReplyDeleteRegarding Dave's comments re: Google's ability to remain an innovation leader.. It's important to define the categories in which we expect Google/Apple/Microsoft/Facebook to lead and innovate.
ReplyDeleteGoogle -let's face it- is generally a one-trick pony. Search & Ads. They are in the mobile business to funnel more inquiries and data back to their search engine, which in turn fuels their ad revenue. In this capacity they are, and will remain for some time, the very best.
Apple, on the other hand, comes from a end-user product perspective. They are product and experience designers with 25 years of success.
When placed on the canvas of media and device convergence, I think we are beginning to see that those who control the experience (Apple) vs the content (Google) might be the winners. So- I think we can all expect that iAds will be a breakout success. Why? B/c it's a platform that will create ads with which people want to interact.
Contrast that with Google's foray into Apple's home turf, device design: The Nexus phone is basically a flop.
In the converged era, Google might have to hire a few non-engineers if they want to remain relevant. Otherwise, if they are not careful, they will wind up like IBM's mainframes - useful, but out of site and out of mind.
Great Mashable post here that adds to the argument that Google has real challenges ahead and lays out 5 reasons why their search franchise is vulnerable.
ReplyDeletehttp://mashable.com/2010/04/29/google-search-wont-dominate/
CNBC report about Google at a crossroads with Display advertising...can they extend their search dominance? Can inquiry targeting capabilities extend to persuasion advertising?http://www.cnbc.com/id/37152946
ReplyDeleteTo follow up on this post and comments above, here are two great articles that explore the future of the Net, WWW vs. Apps, Google vs. Apple and Facebook, Open vs. Closed, Free vs. Paid content, etc. Is it an all or nothing world? I believe the Web can co-exist with the closed platforms. Users will always need fast answers to their questions and the open Web/Search will continue to offer the best answer experience.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.wired.com/magazine/2010/08/ff_webrip/all/1
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/13/technology/13future.html?_r=1&ref=business
We live in provocative times. What do you think?